Divine Dining, Inc. v. Kompany, LLC.
Enforcing fair and honest dealings. Breach of lease and interference with business case.  (status)

Fabian v. Loma Linda University Hospital
Medical safety. Medical negligence action alleging cerebral palsy and spastic quadriplegia from birth injury. (status)

Koch v. Markel Insurance Co.  
Enforcing professional standards for insurance. Breach of insurance contract and bad faith.  (status)

More Active Cases...

Anderson v. Village Covenant Church | $980,000

Luksan v. Colvin | $306, 590  (Read client letter)

Kaufman v. Record Surplus | $425,000

Doe v. Luster  | $20,526,000

Doe HOA vs. Roe Ins. Co. | $13,500,000

Doe Insured v. Doe Disability Insurance Co. | $6,900,000

Mary Doe vs. Pharmaceutical Company  | $6,000,000

more cases & verdicts....

Damian Walton
Los Angeles
Client

"Basically I'm 100% satisfied with the outcome of my case. They were inviting to any questions I had, they encouraged me to ask questions, they always gave me a prompt and accurate response. They returned all my phone calls. Mr. Daniels and his staff were courteous to me throughout the whole case from start to finish."

Bill Daniels Law Offices, APC
16133 Ventura Boulevard, Penthouse Suite A
Encino, CA 91436
Get Directions

(800) 573-0490

Email us


Southern California
SuperLawyer 2010


AVVO Rated 10.0/10

United States Supreme Court
United States
Supreme Court

Southern California SuperLawyer 2009

 


WHISTLEBLOWER RETALIATION
QUI-TAM

Qui tam is a provision of the Federal False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729, that allows private citizens to file a lawsuit in the name of the U.S. Government when funds have been stolen from the government through fraud by corporations, government contractors and others who receive or use government funds; and the whistleblower can receive a portion of the recovery as an incentive for serving the public good.

Qui tam attorneys represent individuals who bring suits, under the False Claims Act and other similar statutes, against businesses that have defrauded federal, state or local governments. The individual bringing the suit is often a whistleblower who has “inside” information about an ongoing fraud scheme.

When employees bring an employer's illegal actions or practices to light, they have a right to be free from retaliation. Under state and federal laws, whistleblowers are entitled to several different protections. 

Contact us today for a free consultation on the merits of your case. When you need experts on a Qui Tam case Bill Daniels | Law Offices is on your side!

Many of the milestone cases we have been involved with have produced reforms in the law that now benefit individuals throughout our state.  Attorneys turn to Bill Daniels | Law Offices to help with the best possible resolution to their problem cases.

More employment law areas:

LEARNING CENTER
for more information:

Bill Daniels regularly publishes a variety of articles and videos to keep you abreast of legal developments and case law that affect our society.

ARTICLES:

California employees are generally “at will,” which limits rights outside of discrimination or other illegal conduct

There are limits on employee drug testing in California

In California there are limits on what an employer can ask during a job interview
Your rights as an employee in California


 

back to top

 


Disclaimer

The contents of this website are for informational purposes only. It is not intended to serve as legal advice. It is not an invitation to establish an attorney-client relationship, and you should not rely upon any information presented here without first seeking legal advice from an attorney licensed to practice law in your jurisdiction. Sending email to Bill Daniels | Law Offices, APC or accessing this website does not form an attorney-client relationship.

Home   Employment Law   Elder Abuse   Serious Personal Injury   Insurance Bad Faith   Class Action   Learning Center   About Our Firm    Resources   Contact Us